July 20, 2026

Oil crops cause 1.5% of global biodiversity loss, ETH Zurich study finds

Oil crops cause about 1.5% of global biodiversity loss, ETH Zurich reports in Nature Food, with oil palm, soybean and coconut driving three-quarters.

Oil crops cause 1.5% of global biodiversity loss, ETH Zurich study finds

A study on oil crops and biodiversity, published in Nature Food on 19 June 2026, finds that crops grown for their oil cause the potential long-term loss of about 1.5% of the world’s plant and terrestrial vertebrate species. The research was led by Stephan Pfister, Professor for Quantitative Sustainability Assessment at ETH Zurich, which describes it as the first study to trace these impacts along global supply chains, from field to finished product. Three crops, oil palm, soybean and coconut, account for about three-quarters of the loss.

The oils involved are everywhere, in margarine and spreads, cosmetics, medicines and animal feed, and both their cultivation and their consumption are rising. The paper sets out the supply-chain link from consumption to species loss, published in Nature Food and quantifies it across nearly all major oil crops at once.

What the oil crops and biodiversity study measured

The team assessed 19 oil crops and tracked their effect on species from 1995 to 2020. The paper, “Oil crop supply chains drive rising global biodiversity loss and outsource impacts to the tropics,” combined spatially explicit maps of where oil crops grow with a global model of trade and production, then applied species-loss factors that estimate how much a given area of farmland contributes to worldwide species decline. To build the maps, the researchers drew on satellite data, agricultural statistics and global land-use datasets.

The headline figure, about 1.5% of global species facing potential long-term loss, is a measure of committed impact: species pushed toward extinction by current and past land use, even where no new clearing takes place. “From the perspective of environmental protection, biodiversity loss is as big a problem as climate change,” said Pfister, according to the announcement from ETH Zurich.

MetricValue
Global species facing potential long-term loss from oil crops (by 2020)about 1.5%
Oil crops assessed19
Share of that loss from oil palm, soybean and coconutthree-quarters (about 75%)
Study period1995 to 2020
Rise in oil-crop biodiversity impact since 1995about four-fifths (about 80%)
Main driver of the riserising per-capita consumption
Impacts outsourced via international trademore than half
Tropical regions: share of harvested areajust under half
Tropical regions: share of impactsalmost four-fifths
EU, China and US: share of outsourced impactsover 80%

Source: Wang et al., “Oil crop supply chains drive rising global biodiversity loss and outsource impacts to the tropics,” Nature Food (2026); ETH Zurich.

Three crops drive three-quarters of the loss

Of the 19 crops studied, oil palm, soybean and coconut caused the largest share of harm, together responsible for about three-quarters of the biodiversity loss linked to oil crops. These crops are tied to species-rich regions and, in the case of oil palm and coconut, grow only in the tropics, where new plantations often replace forest. The study also records a rising trend: the biodiversity impact of oil crops grew by about four-fifths between 1995 and 2020, attributed mainly to higher per-capita consumption rather than population growth.

Three oil crops account for about three-quarters of oil-crop-driven biodiversity loss Share of oil-crop biodiversity loss, by crop group (%) 0 25 50 75 100 about 75% about 25% Oil palm, soybean and coconut (3 crops) Other 16 oil crops
Three of the 19 oil crops assessed cause about three-quarters of oil-crop biodiversity loss. Source: Wang et al., Nature Food (2026); ETH Zurich.

How demand outsources biodiversity loss to the tropics

More than half of the biodiversity loss is outsourced through international trade, the study finds, as importing regions shift the impact onto tropical producers. The European Union, China and the United States together account for over 80% of these outsourced impacts. The EU’s share is linked mainly to imported palm oil, while China’s is tied to soybean used for animal feed. Tropical regions hold just under half of the harvested area but bear almost four-fifths of the impact.

“Per-capita consumption is the biggest driver of biodiversity loss. Yet most of this impact occurs thousands of miles away from the end consumer,” said Shuntian Wang, a doctoral student on Pfister’s team in ETH Zurich’s Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering.

How oil-crop demand in importing regions outsources biodiversity loss to tropical producing regions How oil-crop demand outsources biodiversity loss to the tropics Consumption (demand side) EU – mainly imported palm oil China – soybean for animal feed United States EU, China and US: over 80% of outsourced impacts trade Biodiversity loss in the tropics Just under half of harvested area Almost four-fifths of all impacts More than half of impacts arrive through international trade
Importing regions displace biodiversity impacts to tropical producers. Source: Wang et al., Nature Food (2026); ETH Zurich.

The authors say production matters as much as consumption. Even without new deforestation, long-running farmland keeps pressure on ecosystems. Pfister points to one main response: “An important lever is investing in better production and in the protection of ecosystems in countries of origin.” Soil- and habitat-friendly methods such as regenerative agriculture aim to keep land productive without clearing more of it, though the researchers caution that demand can simply move to another region if single markets act alone. ETH Zurich has also released an interactive dashboard of the results.

Background: measuring agriculture’s toll on biodiversity

Researchers have documented for years that oil palm expansion drives tropical deforestation and species loss in Southeast Asia, and that soybean expansion has reshaped South American savannas. What the new work adds to the study of oil crops and biodiversity is a consumption-and-trade accounting: it connects the species lost in producing regions to the demand that drives planting, across nearly all major oil crops at once. Biodiversity protection sits within the wider sustainability agenda set out in the UN Sustainable Development Goals, whose Goal 15 targets life on land.

The findings point to familiar levers: less waste and lower-impact consumption on the demand side, and on the supply side, protecting forests and raising yields so less land is cleared. Winss Solutions has examined how gentler farming can still pay, including ways sustainable agriculture can be profitable. By following oil from the finished product back to the plantation, the ETH Zurich team gives policymakers and companies a clearer map of where, and for whom, biodiversity is being lost.

Sources: Nature Food; ETH Zurich; Nature Food (DOI)


Become a Sponsor

Our website is the heart of the mission of WINSS – it’s where we share updates, publish research, highlight community impact, and connect with supporters around the world. To keep this essential platform running, updated, and accessible, we rely on the generosity of you, who believe in our work.

We offer the option to sponsor monthly, or just once choosing the amount of your choice. If you run a company, please contact us via info@winssolutions.org.

Select a Donation Option (USD)

Enter Donation Amount (USD)

What do you feel about this?