The World Technically ‘Recovered’ from COVID-19 Shock – Millions Left Behind in Extreme Poverty

Post-pandemic extreme poverty trends show a world that has technically “recovered” from the COVID-19 shock. However, the world is nowhere near ending extreme poverty by 2030. At the global level, the share of people living on less than the international poverty line has moved back toward pre-COVID levels, yet low-income countries, fragile and conflict-affected states, and much of Sub-Saharan Africa remain stuck or are moving backwards.

In this article I will work further on the World Bank’s Data recent blog article “Post-pandemic trends in extreme poverty around the world” and add data from recent World Bank reports, UN SDG updates, ILO analysis, and complementary research to show where poverty is falling, where it is rising, and what this implies for the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals.

What ‘extreme poverty’ means after COVID-19

Global poverty statistics are built around a set of standardized poverty lines. Until recently, the main line for extreme poverty was US$2.15 per person per day, expressed in 2017 purchasing power parity (PPP). This line still underpins much of the official tracking of SDG 1.

The World Bank also uses higher poverty lines to capture deprivation in richer developing economies:

• US$3.65/day for lower-middle-income countries
• US$6.85/day for upper-middle-income countries

In June 2025, the World Bank updated its global poverty database again. A methodological revision introduced a new US$3/day “International Poverty Line”, which increased the estimated number of people in “extreme” poverty by about 125 million people, even though the underlying incomes did not change.

For this article I’ll focus on three concepts for post-pandemic extreme poverty trends:

1. The 2.15-dollar line (traditional extreme poverty benchmark and SDG1 anchor).
2. The higher 3–3.65-dollar lines, which better capture “near-poor” populations highly vulnerable to shocks.
3. The 6.85-dollar line, which describes “moderate poverty” in upper-middle-income settings and reveals how many people still live just above basic subsistence.

Understanding which line is used is crucial when comparing COVID-19 impact on global extreme poverty across publications.

How COVID-19 reversed decades of progress in a single year

Before the pandemic, the world had been reducing extreme poverty steadily for nearly three decades. Global extreme poverty fell from roughly 36% of the world’s population in 1990 to around 8.4% in 2019.

COVID-19 completely broke that trajectory as you will see.

• Using the 2.15-dollar extreme poverty line, World Bank research estimates that the global poverty rate jumped from 8.4% in 2019 to about 9.3% in 2020.
• That increase pushed around 90–97 million additional people into extreme poverty compared with a no-pandemic scenario, marking the largest annual rise since at least 1990.

However, the COVID-19 impact on global inequality and poverty did not fall evenly:

• Between-country inequality rose as advanced economies deployed large fiscal support, while many low-income countries could not.
• Within-country inequality shifted in complex ways but was often driven by job losses in informal sectors, school closures, and limited access to digital tools.
• The global Gini index increased by 0.7 points, erasing part of the reduction achieved over the previous two decades.

From a post-pandemic extreme poverty trends perspective, the most important fact is that the world lost at least three years of progress in one big shock. Even where the global numbers are now close to pre-COVID levels, the path is no longer aligned with the SDG1 target of reducing extreme poverty to below 3% by 2030.

Post-pandemic extreme poverty trends, 2021–2025: broad recovery, uneven outcomes

The World Bank’s January 2026 Data Blog on post-pandemic trends in extreme poverty around the world uses Macro Poverty Outlook (MPO) projections for 115 low- and middle-income countries to trace poverty after the shock.

Key findings:

• Since 2021, poverty is projected to have declined in most countries, but progress is uneven.
• Three out of four countries are expected to have seen poverty fall between 2021 and 2024.
• In 2025, 80% of countries were projected to experience declining poverty rates, which would be the largest share of improving countries in a decade.

The main driver for this improvement is renewed GDP growth:

• Between 2021 and 2024, 86% of countries saw positive average GDP growth.
• In 2025, about 85% of countries are projected to register real GDP growth, and the MPO model assumes that this growth flows through to household incomes, translating into lower poverty.

From a global extreme poverty rate after COVID-19 viewpoint we see this:

• Using updated PPPs and nowcasts, the World Bank estimates global extreme poverty (new methodology) at 10.5% in 2022, declining to 9.9% in 2025.
• A separate flagship report, “Poverty, Prosperity, and Planet” (2024), puts extreme poverty at about 8.5% in 2024 (roughly 700 million people) using the 2.15-dollar line.

These differences stem from updated poverty lines and PPPs, and not from a sudden deterioration of living standards between the reports. The conclusion to be made however is that post-pandemic extreme poverty is falling again, but too slowly and too unevenly.

Where poverty is falling fastest after COVID-19

According to the World Bank’s post-pandemic extreme poverty blog nearly all countries in Europe and Central Asia (ECA), East Asia and Pacific (EAP), and Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) recorded declines in poverty between 2021 and 2024.

This aligns with macroeconomic data that show that many of these regions deployed sizable fiscal support and rolled out vaccination campaigns faster than low-income countries. By 2022–2023, labor markets had largely reopened, tourism recovered in several middle-income economies, and remittances remained resilient.

A concrete example of post-COVID-19 extreme poverty reduction comes from India:

• Recent World Bank estimates suggest that between 2011–12 and 2022–23, the number of people living in extreme poverty in India fell from roughly 344 million to about 75 million, and the extreme poverty rate in India declined from 27.1% to 5.3%.
• That implies around 269–270 million people moved out of extreme poverty over a decade, despite the COVID-19 shock.

This shows how large middle-income countries can still reduce extreme poverty after COVID-19 when growth, social programs, and structural reforms pull in the same direction.

Where poverty is stuck or rising: low-income and fragile states

The optimistic global headline contrasts with the fact that post-pandemic extreme poverty is increasingly concentrated in a small group of countries.

Only about half of low-income countries (11 of 21) saw poverty fall between 2021 and 2024. In the Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan, and Pakistan (MENAAP) region, only 4 of 8 countries are projected to have reduced poverty. In Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), just 18 of 46 countries (around 40%) are expected to have experienced poverty declines; the rest likely saw rising extreme poverty.

Among fragile, conflict-affected and violent (FCV) countries, only about one-third (8 of 23) saw improvements over this period.

Broader data deepen this grim picture:

• In 2024, Sub-Saharan Africa accounted for 16% of the world’s population but 67% of people living in extreme poverty.
• When all fragile and conflict-affected countries are counted, roughly three quarters of the world’s extreme poor live in these contexts.

ILO analysis using harmonized data estimates that by 2024:

• About 10.3% of the world’s population – that is around 839 million people – were living in extreme poverty, measured using updated lines.
• It took until 2022 just to regain pre-pandemic global poverty levels, meaning two years of lost progress and an ongoing backlog in low-income economies.

The COVID-19 impact on extreme poverty in low-income countries therefore remains visible long after advanced and emerging economies resumed growth.

Fragile and conflict-affected states: the epicenter of future extreme poverty

A core post-pandemic extreme poverty trend is the concentration of deprivation in fragile and conflict-affected states (FCS):

• Recent World Bank analysis finds that economies in conflict host over half of the world’s extreme poor, despite having under 15% of the global population.
• More than 420 million people in FCS economies live on less than US$3/day, a number projected to reach 435 million by 2030, or nearly 60% of the world’s extreme poor under that threshold.

These fragile and conflict-affected states extreme poverty statistics show why global progress has slowed:

• Since 2020, per capita income in FCS economies has shrunk by about 1.8% per year, while other developing countries experienced 2.9% annual per capita growth.
• Conflicts cause direct destruction, displacement, and school closures, and they erode state capacity to deliver health, education (272 million children are right now left behind in education), and social protection.

As long as conflict intensity remains high, post-pandemic extreme poverty projections for 2030 will show large pockets of entrenched deprivation in these countries, even if other regions continue to recover.

Post-pandemic extreme poverty projections to 2030

The earlier mentioned World Bank’s “Poverty, Prosperity, and Planet” report also offers the first post-pandemic global assessment of poverty trajectories through 2030.

Key findings from the report:

• Today (mid-2020s): roughly 700 million people – that is about 8.5% of the global population – live in extreme poverty on less than US$2.15/day.
• By 2030, on current trends, around 622 million people (7.3% of the global population) will still live in extreme poverty. This is well above the SDG target of less than 3%.
• At the US$6.85/day line, about 3.5 billion people (44% of the world’s population) are poor by upper-middle-income standards, and this figure has barely moved since the 1990s due to population growth.

The UN SDG 2025 progress report gives a similarly sobering picture. Without major policy acceleration, 8.9% of the global population will still live in extreme poverty in 2030 under the revised poverty line, and only one in five countries is on track to halve national poverty rates by 2030.

In other words, post-pandemic extreme poverty projections for 2030 describe a world where most regions reduce extreme poverty modestly, Sub-Saharan Africa and conflict-affected countries remain far off track, and the global goal of “ending” extreme poverty by 2030 is not met.

Structural drivers: climate, debt, labor markets, and social protection

Post-pandemic trends in extreme poverty depend on more than just GDP growth. Several elements create a mix that drives extreme poverty.

Climate and food prices

• Climate-related shocks – droughts, floods, storms – hit low-income and rural populations hardest, undermining agriculture, destroying assets, and pushing households back below the poverty line.
• Recent food price spikes linked to war and extreme weather have increased food insecurity, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa and parts of MENA, where many people live just above US$2.15/day and are highly exposed to price changes.

Debt and fiscal space

• Many low-income and lower-middle-income countries entered the pandemic with limited fiscal space and high debt; emergency borrowing has since raised debt burdens.
• High debt service crowds out spending on education, health, and social safety nets, slowing recovery in post-pandemic extreme poverty in low-income countries.

Social protection and labor markets

Countries that cushioned the COVID-19 shock through cash transfers, wage subsidies, and unemployment support generally saw fewer people falling into extreme poverty. Where coverage is thin and informality high, job losses translated quickly into COVID-19-driven spikes in rural and urban poverty.

The long-term post-pandemic extreme poverty trends therefore depend on:

• Extending social protection coverage to informal workers and rural households,
• Investing in inclusive, job-rich growth,
• Managing climate risks, and
• Reducing conflict and fragility.

Ten countries where progress matters most

The World Bank blog focuses on 10 countries with the largest numbers of people living in poverty: Nigeria, Ethiopia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Pakistan, Tanzania, Sudan, Mozambique, Uganda, Kenya, and Indonesia.

Most of these:

• Have large and rapidly growing populations,
• Face climate and security risks,
• Depend heavily on agriculture and informal employment, and
• Have limited fiscal space for large-scale transfers.

Post-pandemic extreme poverty trends in these countries will heavily influence the global numbers. If they achieve sustained, inclusive growth, hundreds of millions of people can move out of extreme poverty. If they stagnate, global progress remains stalled even if other regions continue to improve.

There is real progress, but the SDG poverty goal for 2030 will not be met

The big picture from all the evidence on post-pandemic trends in extreme poverty around the world is clear:

• The world has, on average, returned to or near pre-COVID levels of extreme poverty.
• Three out of four countries have reduced poverty since 2021; 80% are projected to do so in 2025.
• Yet progress is too slow and too uneven to meet SDG 1 by 2030.
• Sub-Saharan Africa and fragile, conflict-affected states now account for a majority of the world’s extreme poor, and their poverty rates remain far above those in other regions.

On current trajectories, hundreds of millions of people will still live below the extreme poverty line in 2030, and billions will remain poor by standards relevant for middle-income countries. This is the direct result of overlapping crises: pandemic, conflict, climate, and debt. On top these elements interact with an already existing and longstanding structural weaknesses.

Accelerating progress requires:

• Ending or de-escalating major conflicts,
• Expanding targeted social protection and food security programs,
• Investing in climate-resilient, job-rich growth, and
• Protecting fiscal space in low-income countries through debt relief and concessional finance.

Without this, what some call a reset, post-pandemic extreme poverty trends will continue to show slow global improvement combined with deepening pockets of deprivation in the world’s most fragile places.

FAQ on post-pandemic extreme poverty trends

1. What is the current global extreme poverty rate after COVID-19?

Using the World Bank’s 2.15-dollar international poverty line, around 8.5% of the global population – about 700 million people – lived in extreme poverty in 2024. Updated nowcasts using revised PPPs put the figure around 9.9% in 2025 under a different methodology.

Both sets of estimates tell the same story: global extreme poverty has returned roughly to pre-COVID levels but is not falling fast enough.

2. How did COVID-19 impact global extreme poverty in 2020?

The COVID-19 impact on global extreme poverty was dramatic:

• The global extreme poverty rate rose from 8.4% in 2019 to about 9.3% in 2020.
• Between 90 and 97 million additional people were pushed into extreme poverty compared with a no-pandemic scenario.

This was the largest recorded annual increase since 1990 and created a multi-year setback for SDG 1.

3. Which regions have the highest post-pandemic extreme poverty rates?

Sub-Saharan Africa and fragile and conflict-affected states have the highest post-pandemic extreme poverty rates:

• Sub-Saharan Africa hosts around 67% of the world’s extreme poor while accounting for only about 16% of the global population.
• Fragile and conflict-affected economies host over half of the extreme poor, and more than 420 million people in these economies live on less than US$3/day, projected to reach 435 million by 2030.

By contrast, most countries in Europe and Central Asia, East Asia and Pacific, and Latin America and the Caribbean are seeing declining poverty rates in the post-pandemic period.

4. Are we on track to end extreme poverty by 2030?

No. Both the World Bank and the UN report that the world is off track:

• World Bank projections show 622 million people (7.3% of the global population) still in extreme poverty in 2030 at the 2.15-dollar line.
• The UN SDG 2025 report estimates that 8.9% of the global population will still live in extreme poverty by 2030 under a revised international poverty line, and only one in five countries will have halved national poverty rates by then.

The SDG 1 target of reducing extreme poverty to below 3% will not be reached without a major policy shift.

5. What is the difference between the 2.15-dollar and 3-dollar poverty lines?

The 2.15-dollar line (2017 PPP) is the long-standing benchmark for extreme poverty and underpins much SDG monitoring.

Recent updates introduced a 3-dollar line (also PPP-adjusted) as a new “International Poverty Line,” which increases the measured number of extreme poor by about 125 million people compared with the 2.15-dollar definition.

Higher lines like 3.65 and 6.85 dollars per day capture broader vulnerability to post-pandemic poverty among people who live above subsistence but below a minimally secure standard of living in middle-income settings.

6. Why are fragile and conflict-affected states so central to future poverty trends?

Fragile and conflict-affected states (FCS) combine:

• Weak institutions,
• Ongoing or recurrent violence, and
• Limited fiscal capacity.

Post-pandemic data show that:

• Per capita incomes in FCS economies have declined by around 1.8% per year since 2020, while other developing economies grew at about 2.9% per year per capita.
• Over 420 million people in these countries live on less than US$3/day, with this number projected to rise to 435 million and nearly 60% of the world’s extreme poor by 2030.

Because poverty is now heavily concentrated in these settings, reducing post-pandemic extreme poverty globally depends heavily on peacebuilding and state-building in FCS.

7. How does climate change affect post-pandemic extreme poverty trends?

Climate change intensifies post-pandemic extreme poverty risks through:

• Crop failures and livestock losses in low-income, agriculture-dependent economies,
• Infrastructure damage from storms and floods, and
• Rising food and energy prices.

Recent global assessments link climate shocks to higher food insecurity and slower poverty reduction, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa and parts of Asia and MENA, where large numbers of people live just above the poverty line and have few buffers.

Interaction with conflict and debt amplifies these risks: countries with limited fiscal space struggle to invest in climate resilience and disaster response.

8. Which policies are most effective in reducing post-pandemic extreme poverty?

Evidence from World Bank and UN analyses points to several effective levers for reducing post-pandemic extreme poverty in low- and middle-income countries:

• Targeted social protection: cash transfers, child benefits, and social pensions scaled up quickly in crises.
• Labor-intensive, climate-resilient infrastructure investments: rural roads, irrigation, electrification, and digital connectivity that create jobs while boosting productivity.
• Human capital investments: restoring learning after school closures, tackling malnutrition, and expanding basic health services.
• Debt relief and concessional finance: freeing fiscal space to fund anti-poverty programs instead of debt service.
• Peacebuilding and governance reforms in FCS: reducing violence and improving public service delivery.

Countries that combine these elements with sustained, inclusive growth tend to experience faster post-pandemic reductions in extreme poverty.

---

---